On Sunday, before a storm rolled through the area, I managed to squeeze in an early morning round with Adam at Hickory Hills Golf Club in Hickory Hills, Illinois. The course is located approximately 20 miles southwest of downtown Chicago. Opening in 1915, Hickory Hills features two courses: the South course, a 18-hole championship course, and the North course, a 9-hole executive course (which is just long enough to count for the project). For this round, Adam and I played the South course.
The South course of Hickory Hills consists of five par-3 and four par-5 holes for a total par of 71 at a length of 6,018 yards from the back tees. There are actually only two sets of tees (the men’s white tees and the women’s red tees), and the width of the tee boxes are very large. The fairways are hilly, open, straight, and surrounded by large trees. Water touches four holes, mostly down the right side of the fairway. You’ll only need to carry a small patch of water on the 7th hole, a 172 yard par-3. Sand traps are found on only four holes, and only near the greens. The greens are fairly large with decent slopes and challenging breaks.
Throughout the round, Adam and I had to deal with dense fog and light rain. For most of the round, you couldn’t see more than 200 yards in front of you. The fairways were pretty wet, the grass was a little higher than normal, and the speed of the greens were random. Other than that, the course looked to be in great condition.
Surprisingly, the fog and rain didn’t hurt my game. I actually played pretty well. I tried something different with my grip during my drives, and, for the most part, my drives seemed to straighten up. I managed to hit over half of the fairways throughout the round, which is something that is not common of me to do. My iron shots were OK. The high, wet grass gave me some issues in some areas, but overall, I was pretty happy with my iron shots. I felt my approach shots and chips were good too. I’ve definitely seen them improve over the last couple of rounds. My putting was random, as expected since the greens were wet. I 1-putted two times and 3-putted six times (mostly on the front nine). I did manage to 1-putt for par from the fringe about 30 feet out from the hole on the 6th hole, a 451 yard par-5. Anytime I can make par on a par-5, I’m happy.
I ended up shooting a 101, which was 30 over par (52 on the front nine, 49 on the back nine), and Adam shot a 109. This was my best round of the season, and my best round ever on a full 18-hole course (I did shoot a 101 when I played the 9-hole Fountain Hills course twice). Throughout the round, I made three pars, five bogeys, six double-bogeys, and four others, including two 4-overs. I was really hoping to hit a goal for the year by shooting four pars in one round. I ended up making bogey on the last three holes, so I was pretty close. Obviously, I could have broken 100 if it wasn’t for a penalty or a couple of duffs. Once again, it’s just a matter of time.
Hickory Hills Golf Club – South Course – Scores & Stats
Course length: 6,018 yards (white tee boxes)
Course par: 71
Course rating/slope: 67.9/116 (white tee boxes)
My score: 101 (30 over par)
Adam’s score: 109 (38 over par)
Hickory Hills Golf Club
8125 W. 95th Street
Hickory Hills, IL 60457
5 Responses for "Hickory Hills Golf Club – South Course"
I’m playing Hickory Hills tomorrow morning. Not too hopeful considering some of the comments I’ve read online but maybe I’ll be surprised! I enjoy your blog btw.
Hey Nate. Thanks for visiting my site.
I wish the weather was nicer when I played Hickory Hills. From what I could tell, the course looked pretty nice, much nicer than some other courses I’ve played in the past. I guess it’s all relative… If you play Dubsdread at Cog Hill all the time, then sure Hickory Hills might not be that nice. The course and the clubhouse feels a little dated, and only having one set of tees might be a drawback for some, but all-in-all, I felt the layout and maintenance of the course was good.
Well a friend and I played this morning. First of all I think this could be a wonderful course and I’m just confused as to why exactly the course was in the shape it was. I can’t tell if it’s because of a lack of money or knowledge. First of all the fairways were not fairways – it would be the low cut rough on any other course. I don’t know anything about golf course management so I’m not sure if it’s just an issue with mowing or the grass itself. Secondly, the greens were so wet and soft they were squishy. It was like walking on a thin mattress. You had to SMASH a putt to get it anywhere near the hole. Maybe they went on a watering binge recently, but these two problems alone made me feel like it wasn’t worth the $40.
The holes themselves were enjoyable to play, there are really cool changes of elevation, nice scenery etc. That is what is so frustrating about the problems with the greens/fairways. If they addressed that it would be a great course. The people were all very nice, my playing partner said the same thing about the clubhouse but I honestly don’t notice those things.
The last thing that bothered me about this course, and this isn’t anything that can be changed is the placement of the greens relative to the tees to the next hole. On just about every single hole you will be teeing off within 5-10 yards of the previous green, so you had better hope you’re playing in front of some experienced golfers with decent iron games lol.
So all in all it was a nice course that can be much better, I enjoyed my round – felt like for $40 I would rather have played Joe Louis or another 25-30 dollar course and had money left over for lunch of a cpl beers.
I agree with you. I think with a little bit of work on the fairways and the greens, this course could be really nice. They have a great piece of land with great scenery. I can’t really say much about the wetness of the greens because when I played it was raining.
As far as the placement of the greens relative to the next tees, I can agree with that also, but I think the distance between the two is more common than you think. I feel like I’ve a lot of courses where there was little distance between the two. I think it’s more common on courses that are squeezed into a square/rectangle of land. Hit a course that wraps around a neighborhood, and you don’t normally see that problem (you do see houses close to the fairways though).
I don’t necessarily think the course is better or worse than Joe Louis. Those Forest Preserve Golf courses, as well as the Chicago Park District courses, have their fair share of issues. On those courses, I’ve mostly noticed poorly maintained bunkers and fairways (with dead/burnt grass).
At that $40 price point in that general area of Chicago, try out Coyote Run in Flossmoor or Silver Lake in Orland Park.
Maybe I’ll start paying more attention. It’s just with this course my partner and I had to watch each other’s backs while we were teeing off, but your point about being squeezed into a piece of land makes sense.
As far as the city courses, you’re spot on about the bunkers – that’s the case with municipal courses in any state. I would almost rather that they just fill in some of the bunkers and create grass mounds so they don’t have to try and spend money for upkeep – freeing up money to actually maintain the ones remaining. That is something I’ve seen city courses in other places I’ve lived have done.
I just recently moved to the Chicago area so I’m still getting a feel for the area and the courses. I’ve heard of Silver Lake. I think George Dunne is next on the agenda though.
Hit em straight
Leave a reply